Independent research initiativeNEURAL NETWORKS × PHILOSOPHY

Intelligence
beyond
boundaries.

We explore how neural networks make meaning, how ideas emerge, and where a cognitive system begins and ends.

A cognitive system extends across interactions between a model, people, tools and contextCONTEXTTOOLSPEOPLEWORLDMODELpermeable boundaries
FIG. 01 / A relational view of cognitionConceptual model
NEURAL NETWORKS / PHILOSOPHY / MATHEMATICSFrom concepts to experiments.

What if intelligence is something that happens between a model and its world?

Leaky Intelligence Lab brings together philosophical inquiry, mathematical ideas and experiments with neural networks. Our research programme connects questions about meaning and agency with the internal dynamics of language models and the systems built around them.

Why “leaky”?

For us, the name expresses a research question: how do the boundaries of cognition change through language, memory, tools and interaction? We study intelligence as an open, relational process.

Four connected questions.

Our starting points for investigation: hypotheses to test, methods to develop, connections to explore.

R / 01

Seeing inside neural networks

How do internal model dynamics shape an answer? We aim to develop tools for inspecting activations and testing causal hypotheses through controlled interventions.

INTERPRETABILITY · ACTIVATIONS · STEERING
R / 02

The emergence of new ideas

When does a change of context lead to a genuinely different idea? We investigate creativity, transitions between meanings, and ways to guide open-weight models without initial fine-tuning.

CREATIVITY · CONTEXT · OPEN-WEIGHT MODELS
R / 03

Where cognition begins and ends

What changes when a language model becomes part of a system with memory, tools, people and other agents? We examine how agency and meaning take shape through these relations.

DISTRIBUTED COGNITION · AGENCY · ENACTIVISM
R / 04

A geometry of meaning

Can geometry reveal structure that ordinary distances miss? We explore p-adic and hierarchical descriptions, and test whether ideas such as holonomy can become useful experimental tools.

P-ADIC STRUCTURES · HIERARCHIES · HOLONOMY
01 — Formulate a question

Make philosophical assumptions explicit and turn them into testable hypotheses.

02 — Build an experiment

Start with small open-weight models, inspect their dynamics, and intervene.

03 — Revisit the concept

Let the findings reshape the question, including when the hypothesis fails.

Different disciplines. Shared curiosity.

Maxim Yanukovich

AI research & philosophy

Head of the Arteus AI laboratory and a researcher pursuing a Candidate of Sciences degree at the Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University. His work connects applied machine learning with the philosophy of cognition, meaning and the observer.

LinkedIn profile

Rodion Karneev

Philosophy of science & technology

Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy and Research Fellow at the Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. His research focuses on subjectivity, ontology, and the philosophy of science and technology, including the reassembly of the subject in the age of neural networks.

Academic profile & publications

Good questions deserve company.

Interested in neural network interpretability, machine creativity, or the philosophy of AI? Get in touch to discuss research, experiments and collaboration.

m.yanukovich@gmail.com

Research enquiries · Maxim Yanukovich